The president highlighted that outdated requirements and bureaucratic hurdles in the standardization and certification systems are “tying the hands” of entrepreneurs and fostering corruption in the sector. Over 25,000 standards and 41 technical regulations do not align with international market requirements. Currently, approximately 6,500 out of 13,000 product types require mandatory certification, which increases production costs.
“When have ministers and regional governors listened to entrepreneurs to consider which standards need updating, which should be abolished, or which products should be removed from mandatory certification lists? Unfortunately, there’s no positive answer to this,” the president stated firmly.
Investors have pointed out that many laboratories in Uzbekistan fail to meet required standards, and standards from developed countries are often not recognized. The current system allows certification bodies to simultaneously oversee market control, leading to conflicts of interest, it was noted.
The president outlined specific issues in the certification system and proposed solutions.
It was emphasized that dairy and meat product manufacturers are dissatisfied with the process of obtaining sanitary and epidemiological conclusions. For example, Uzbekistan imports $100 million worth of baby food annually. However, an entrepreneur who invests in modern equipment and builds a factory cannot start production due to the absence of a sanitary conclusion, as no standard exists for the product.
The committee leadership was criticized for failing to proactively develop standards in collaboration with entrepreneurs, instead passively stating, “There’s no standard for this product.”
Some district sanitary services still require separate testing for each differently packaged batch of the same product, demanding additional time and costs. The president questioned the relevance of packaging variations to product quality.
Additionally, mineral water producers must obtain conclusions based on 45 indicators, with 43 tested at the laboratories of the criticizes Sanitary and Epidemiological Service and the remaining two at other labs. The committee was tasked with organizing all tests in one location.
To check the quality of fruits, vegetables, and legumes, producers must visit laboratories of three different organizations. Worse, these laboratories’ conclusions are not recognized in developed countries. As a result, exporters must send samples abroad to obtain certifications for accessing high-value markets. Authorities were criticized for not yet establishing a single internationally recognized laboratory and for continuing outdated, redundant certification practices.
