Criminal case opened against Global Avto Kredit officials over fraudulent car sales scheme
Following an investigation by Kun.uz, a criminal case has been launched against officials of Global Avto Kredit LLC, a Tashkent-based firm accused of operating a large-scale fraudulent scheme involving the import of electric vehicles from China. The Ministry of Internal Affairs spokesperson, Shokhrukh Giyosov, confirmed to Kun.uz that the investigation is currently underway.
The criminal case was officially initiated on November 12, 2025, after Kun.uz raised concerns regarding the legitimacy of the company's operations. Global Avto Kredit allegedly promised citizens vehicles under highly favorable terms, including interest-free installment plans. However, reports indicate that the firm collected substantial payments without signing proper contracts or fulfilling its delivery obligations.
The case has been classified under Article 168, Part 4, Clause "a" of the Criminal Code, which pertains to fraud on an especially large scale. Despite the investigation beginning nearly five months ago – exceeding the standard three-month preliminary investigation period – those involved remain at liberty. Concerned clients have reported that the company's office has since been sealed.
This case surfaces amid broader criticism of investigative quality and law enforcement effectiveness. President Shavkat Mirziyoyev recently highlighted public dissatisfaction with the handling of complaints and the rise of organized crime operating under the guise of legitimate businesses. During a video conference in January, the president noted that criminal groups have increasingly infiltrated profitable sectors, including real estate, car sales, financial pyramids, and pilgrimage services.
Global Avto Kredit LLC was registered in February 2025 and began aggressive advertising in May, promising luxury electric cars. A Kun.uz investigation previously revealed that video clips posted by the firm claiming to show vehicle deliveries were misleading, as the cars had actually been purchased from other local dealerships. During earlier questioning by Kun.uz, the firm's director claimed they withdrew client funds deposited in banks as dividends to send cash to China – a practice that raised further regulatory red flags.
Related News
14:15
Customs officers foil illegal Starlink import; criminal case opened
15:47 / 31.03.2026
Uzbekistan’s FTT hits $11.6 billion in first two months of 2026
12:52 / 31.03.2026
China Eastern Airlines launches direct flights between Tashkent and Shanghai
17:55 / 30.03.2026